Federal Evidence Blog

FEDERAL EVIDENCE BLOGHighlighting recent cases and issues involving the Federal Rules of Evidence and other topical evidence matters. Topics range from the new Attorney-Client Privilege Rule (FRE 502), electronic, Internet and expert evidence issues, Confrontation Clause, pending rule amendments, legislation, privilege issues, recent noteworthy cases and other issues, practical tips, "Supreme Court Watch" entries and more.

Redacted Accomplice Confession Failed To Cure Confrontation Clause Error

In the trial of a single defendant, the efforts to redact the confession of an accomplice were insufficient to cure a violation of the Confrontation Clause; the trial court confused the Bruton rule, which may permit redacted statements of nontestifying codefendants, in a joint trial; nonetheless, the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, in United States v. Shaw, _ F.3d _ (10th Cir. July 11, 2014) (No. 13-3050)

Read more

Circuit Consensus: Drawing An Adverse Inference From A Nonparty Witness's Invocation Of The Fifth Amendment Privilege

Eleventh Circuit confronts an issue of first impression concerning the circumstances in which a nonparty may invoke the Fifth Amendment before a civil jury; circuit explains that the application of the Fifth Amendment is different in criminal and civil cases; circuit concludes that one party could call a nonparty witness “to the stand for the purpose of having him invoke the Fifth Amendment privilege in the jury’s presence,” in Coquina Investments v. TD Bank, N.A., _ F.3d _ (11th Cir. July 29, 2014) (No. 12-11161)

Read more

Establishing The Non-Existence Of Public Records Under FRE 803(10)

Ninth Circuit considers the application of FRE 803(10) to establish the non-existence of a special use permit to operate a snowmobile on forest service land; the testimony of the officer was sufficient to meet the requirements of the rule, in United States v. Parker, _ F.3d _ (9th Cir. July 31, 2014) (No. 13-30157)

Read more

The Challenges In Establishing Withdrawal From A Conspiracy

One requirement in admitting co-conspirator statements under FRE 801(d)(2)(E) is the defendant's participation in the conspiracy at the time of the statement; First Circuit concludes the defendant failed to show he withdrew from the conspiracy and therefore the challenged statements were properly admitted, in United States v. George, _ F.3d _ (1st Cir. July 30, 2014) (No. 12-2373)

Read more

Noting The Limits To The "Open Door" Doctrine

In examining the use of the “open door” doctrine, Eighth Circuit concludes that the doctrine could not be used to admit an officer’s conclusions about a traffic accident as the testimony did not “clear up” any misimpression created by his prior testimony; circuit also notes the limitations to using the "open door" doctrine, in Valadez v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc., _ F.3d _ (8th Cir. July 11, 2014) (No. 12–3679)

Read more

New Judicial Survey Concerning The Use Of Social Media By Jurors And Attorneys

A new survey of federal trial judges reviews the use of social media by jurors at trial; the survey also provides sample jury instructions used by several trial judges to discourage social media use during a trial, in a recent FJC publication: Jurors’ and Attorneys’ Use of Social Media During Voir Dire, Trials, and Deliberations: A Report to the Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management, Federal Judicial Center (May 1, 2014)

Read more

Proper Use Of An IRS Summary Witness In A Tax Prosecution

First Circuit considers whether the use of an IRS summary witness was improper and concludes that the testimony was proper since it was based on admissible evidence, helped “analyze facts already introduced into evidence” and did not “directly address the ultimate question” in the case, in United States v. Ulloa, _ F.3d _ (1st Cir. July 28, 2014) (No. 13-1577)

Read more

Applying The Emergency Category of Nontestimonial Statements

In hostage taking case, Ninth Circuit affirms the admission of the mother's report to law enforcement concerning her call with the captors, who demanded money for her son's return; the statements were admitted under the "emergency category of nontestimonial statements" and the Confrontation Clause was not violated, in United States v. Liera-Morales, _ F.3d _ (9th Cir. July 21, 2014) (No. 12-10548)

Read more

Assessing The “Prior Opportunity For Cross-Examination” Under The Confrontation Clause

Sixth Circuit explores the Confrontation Clause requirement concerning “a prior opportunity for cross-examination” of an unavailable witness from two separate preliminary hearings, in Williams v. Bauman, _ F.3d _ (6th Cir. July 21, 2014) (13–1463)

Read more

Circuit Split: Does FRE 106 Rule Of Completeness Apply To Oral Statements?

While it is clear that the Rule of Completeness under FRE 106 applies to written and recorded statements, does it apply to oral statements? The Ninth Circuit recently noted a division on this issue; nonetheless the rule did not apply because the statements "were neither misleading nor taken out of context," in United States v. Liera-Morales, _ F.3d _ (9th Cir. July 21, 2014) (No. 12-10548)

Read more
Federal Rules of Evidence